SERIES
WP04-CIG-2026-04 — Comparative Models: Evaluation Architecture for Investment-Led Creative Growth
Investment, Inclusion and Transmission in the UK Creative Economy (CIG-2026)
WP04-CIG-2026-04 — Comparative Models: Evaluation Architecture for Investment-Led Creative Growth
Publication details
-
Series: Investment, Inclusion and Transmission in the UK Creative Economy (CIG-2026)
-
Number: WP04-CIG-2026-01
-
Status: Published
-
Year: 2026
-
Authors: Ian Oliver – Creative Enterprise Lab
WP4 examines value capture: when creative output scales, who captures the value, and what governance or market structures shape that capture? It focuses on openness regimes, IP arrangements, platforms, and contractual norms.
Summary
The paper interrogates extraction pathways that allow growth to occur without shared benefit. It treats openness as a design choice with distributional consequences, not an unqualified public good.
What this output shows and why it matters
WP4 shows how creative growth can intensify inequality if value capture is structurally asymmetric. This matters because ‘growth’ can be real while wages, rights, and bargaining power stagnate.
How it fits the series logic
WP4 provides the distributional logic that often explains labour outcomes observed in WP2 and the institutional patterns analysed in WP3. It also informs WP5 by clarifying why diffusion can be weak even when output scales.
How to read this
Quick route: read the core capture mechanisms and the section on platform and contractual dynamics. Deeper route: read the counter-position that defends openness, and note the conditions under which openness can be genuinely enabling.
Outputs it connects to
Related: WP2 (labour) and WP3 (institutions). Next: WP5 (regional diffusion) and RP1 (synthesis).
Access the paper
WP04-CIG-2026-04 - Comparative Models: Evaluation Architecture for Investment-Led Creative Growth
Citation
Creative Enterprise Lab (2026) WP04-CIG-2026-04 — Comparative Models: Evaluation Architecture for Investment-Led Creative Growth. CIG-2026 Working Paper.
Research integrity
CEL Series Papers are:
-
grounded in real-world conditions
-
informed by established research and scholarship
-
accountable to evidence generated through practice
They do not offer universal solutions or prescriptions. Their purpose is to support clearer thinking, informed debate, and responsible decision-making.